top of page

A DISTURBING IMAGE: What does Akhenaten's family really show?

Oct 5
3 min read

What we're seeing isn't just a simple "artistic recoloring." It's a visual experiment: taking one of the most famous reliefs of ancient Egypt, designed to be observed through light and shadow, and restoring color, depth, and a greater sense of physicality. The result is surprising and, in some ways, disturbing.


The original image is a relief from the Amarna period (14th century BC), depicting Akhenaten and Nefertiti, seated facing each other while holding their royal daughters. The sun disk Aten dominates from above, its rays terminating in small hands offering the Ankh, symbol of life. This scene is one of the best-known icons of the religious revolution desired by Akhenaten: the exclusive cult of Aten, the abandonment of the traditional pantheon, the centrality of the royal family as a direct intermediary between the "god" and humanity. So far, nothing new. But it is precisely when color is introduced that the image ceases to be reassuring.


Relief of Akhenaten, Nefertiti and the royal daughters with comparison between the original and coloured versions

Observe especially the figures of the royal daughters. In the monochrome relief, many features may seem simply the result of artistic style. But when the forms acquire color, depth, and volume, the perception changes: the skulls appear very elongated and voluminous, the limbs thin, the chests narrow, the hips broad, and the abdomens prominent.


It is precisely this shift from monochrome stone to a more "physical" reconstruction that makes the image so unsettling. The figures no longer appear merely symbolic or stylized: they take on the appearance of biologically atypical bodies. Frankly, at first glance, they almost resemble small aliens.


Of course, a colored reconstruction alone can't demonstrate the actual appearance of the people depicted. But it can highlight proportions and details that, in the original bas-relief, tend to be perceived as simple artistic conventions. And this is precisely where the most interesting question arises: are we looking at a style, or an attempt to represent real physical characteristics?


Just an artistic style?


The most common explanation is that it is simply the artistic style of the Amarna period. But this is precisely where a difficulty arises: artistic styles do not usually appear in a vacuum and disappear without a trace. They tend to develop gradually, to be imitated, modified, and extended to other subjects.


In the case of Akhenaten's family, however, something very peculiar occurs. Akhenaten, Nefertiti, and their daughters are depicted with unusual physical proportions, while much of the rest of the population continues to be depicted in a much more conventional manner. It's as if those characteristics belonged primarily to a very specific group.


The duration of the phenomenon is also striking. With the end of the Amarna period, many of these artistic anomalies rapidly disappeared, and Egyptian art returned to more traditional forms. There appears to be no long transitional phase or true stylistic legacy capable of permanently transforming Egyptian art.


And so the question becomes inevitable: if those forms were merely an aesthetic choice, why apply them in such an extreme way to the royal family? And why abandon them almost completely immediately afterward?


What if the artists simply depicted what they saw?


If the Amarna artists had not invented those proportions, but had tried to reproduce real features of the royal family, then the problem would change completely.


At that point, we would no longer be talking simply about an unusual style, but about people who appeared physically different from the standards of their time. Elongated skulls, slender bodies, prominent abdomens, extreme features: elements that, taken individually, can be explained artistically, but which together produce an effect that is difficult to ignore.


An unconventional hypothesis


It's unconvincing to think this is just art, because artistic styles don't emerge and disappear suddenly. In any civilization, a new visual trend takes time to establish itself: intermediate forms, imitations, variations appear, and the style gradually spreads among artists and the population. Here, however, something anomalous occurs: only four people—Akhenaten, Nefertiti, and their daughters—are depicted with completely different, almost inhuman physical features, while all other Egyptians continue to be depicted in the traditional manner.


There is no transitional phase, nor any extension of the style to other subjects. Immediately after the end of this dynasty, Egyptian art suddenly returned to normality, as if nothing had happened. In simple and rational terms, it is therefore more logical to think that the artists were drawing what they actually saw, rather than imagining an extreme artistic style, limited to a very few individuals, born and died without leaving a trace.


Were Akhenaten and his family visitors?


For those who wish, you can learn more about the topic in the following publications:



Book Homo Reloaded

























Book Before us there was someone - 1


























Book Before us there was someone - 2














 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page